< Back to Blog

Ryan Brackin

Ryan Brackin

January 22, 2019

Metro Cities Sue Pavement Sealant Makers for Alleged Stormwater Retention Pond Contamination

Eight Twin Cities suburbs recently filed identical suits in Minnesota federal court alleging that several companies’ refined coal tar products used in pavement sealants have contaminated city ponds.  The cities claim that the pavement sealants are contaminated with high levels of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (“PAHs”).  According to the lawsuits, as the pavement sealants degrade, fine particles of the refined coal tar products migrate into the environment via wind and rain and accumulate in city stormwater retention ponds.

The plaintiffs contend that sediment contaminated with high levels of PAHs requires testing, special handling and disposal in connection with periodic dredging of the retention ponds. The lawsuits allege that this has greatly increased costs for managing stormwater infrastructure.  Minnesota pollution officials have estimated potential costs of more than $1 billion to clean out Twin Cities metro-area ponds, according to the Twin Cities Pioneer Press.1

In 2014, Minnesota became the second state to ban the use and sale of pavement sealants using refined coal tar. Prior to the ban, refined coal tar-based sealants were commonly applied to asphalt driveways and parking lots. The plaintiff cities claim adequate substitutes exist and that defendants knew or should have known of the links between the use of refined coal tar in sealants and the rise in PAH contamination in urban lakes and ponds.

The eight lawsuits are captioned as follows:

  • City of Burnsville, Minnesota v. Koppers Inc. et al., Court File No. 18-CV-03495-MJD-DTS;
  • City of Eden Prairie v. Koppers Inc. et al., Court File No. 18-CV-03496-DWF-KMM;
  • City of Maple Grove v. Koppers Inc. et al., Court File No. 18-CV-03497-NEB-BRT;
  • City of White Bear Lake v. Koppers Inc. et al., 18-CV-03498-JNE-KMM;
  • City of Minnetonka v. Koppers Inc. et al., 18-CV-03501-NEB-SER;
  • City of Bloomington v. Koppers Inc. et al., 18-CV-03503-DWF-ECW;
  • City of Golden Valley vKoppers Inc. et al., 18-CV-03509-JRT-ECW; and
  • City of Eagan, Minnesota v. Koppers Inc. et al., 19-CV-00058-MJD-DTS.

If you have any questions regarding the content of this article or other environmental topics, please contact the author at (651) 227-9411.


1  Josh Verges, White Bear Lake, other cities sue makers of banned driveway sealant, alleging $1 billion pond problem, PIONEER PRESS (January 3, 2019, 8:50 a.m.), https://www.twincities.com/2019/01/02/minnesota-cities-sue-makers-of-banned-driveway-sealant-alleging-1-billion-pond-problem/.



Haws-KM News



The information contained in this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice on any matter.

The transmission and receipt of information contained on this website, in whole or in part, or communication with HAWS-KM, P.A. or any of its employees via the Internet or e-mail through this website does not constitute or create an attorney/client relationship between us and any recipient. You should not send us any confidential information in response to this website as such information will not be held in confidence. Any communication to this website does not create an attorney/client relationship, and whatever you disclose to us will not be privileged or confidential unless we have agreed to act as your legal counsel in writing. The material on this website may provide information regarding developments in the law but is not legal advice. The content and interpretation of the law addressed on the website is subject to change. HAWS-KM, P.A. disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this website to the fullest extent permitted by law. Websites, such as this one, are considered attorney advertising, not legal advice. For legal advice, seek professional legal counsel.